Railroad Lawsuit Kidney Cancer
Railroad workers are frequently exposed to carcinogens with a high risk of cancer. Exposed to diesel fuel, benzene, creosote and other toxic substances has led to cancer and other chronic diseases such as leukemia, lung cancer, mesothelioma, bladder cancer, and kidney cancer.

If you or someone you know has developed an illness of serious severity that was related to your involvement with railroads, contact a knowledgeable railroad cancer attorney now for a free consultation.
Exposure to carcinogens
Railroad workers are exposed a variety of dangerous carcinogens on a regular basis. These include diesel exhaust, asbestos and benzene. Numerous lawsuits for cancer of the railroad have been filed against various railroad companies. These lawsuits have been filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) which was passed in 1908.
The victims who contract cancer as a result of on-the-job exposure could be entitled to compensation. An attorney for railroad injuries will review a victim’s claim and determine whether an FELA lawsuit is possible against the company that caused the illness.
A railroad employee may be entitled to compensation for medical expenses, lost wages and other damages related to their illness. Leukemia lawsuit can help clients file a lawsuit within the three-year period of limitations set by FELA.
Plaintiff James Brown alleges that he developed leukemia as the result of working for years on trains exposed to chemicals such as creosote, and degreasing solvents. He worked on tanks, brake shoes and cabooses. He claims he walked across railroad ties that smelled of creosote, and saw plaques with skulls and crosses on train cars, signalling toxic substances. He also claims he was exposed to diesel fumes when working on locomotive engines and when stopping in tunnels. The toxins made his breathing difficult and caused headaches.
Failure to Provide a Safe Work Environment
Despite the fact that work on railroads has always presented a significant risk, recent research has revealed that a number of the common occupational hazards that railway workers face are directly linked to cancer and other serious diseases. Federal law requires railroad companies to provide their employees with sufficient direction and protection in order to keep them safe. If they do not follow the law with this requirement, they could be held accountable for severe injuries that result in death, or financial ruin.
You should seek advice from a knowledgeable lawyer when you were a railroad worker or have someone you love who was. An attorney can assist you to determine whether you have a viable lawsuit in light of your exposure to carcinogens that are dangerous. A three-year statute is in effect, so you should contact an attorney as soon as you can.
In addition to asbestos, railroad workers also are exposed to toxic chemicals such as creosote as well as diesel fumes and exhaust. These toxic fumes can be the source of cancers, including mesothelioma and other lung diseases. If you've developed one of these diseases it is essential that you consult a qualified railroad injury lawyer as soon as possible.
The plaintiff was employed by the ICRC as a mechanic/carman from September 1975 until December 2015. He claims that his time at the ICRC caused him to develop renal (and then adrenal) cancer. He claims that he was continually exposed to the dangerous chemical carbon tetrachloride. It is utilized by railroads to cleanse their tracks and braking systems.
Negligence
A lawsuit involving railroads can be filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) which allows railroad workers to directly make complaints against their employers. In order for a worker to seek damages, they must prove that the negligence of the railroad company was the cause of their injury or illness.
Plaintiff Greger was exposed during his work on the railroad, to various hazardous chemicals and environmental conditions. Carbon tetrachloride was utilized to clean brake and rail systems. He claims that the company did not inform him of the potential dangers of this chemical which is known to cause cancer.
He also walked across rail ties coated in creosote. Bladder cancer lawsuit claims it was known to be harmful. He also inhaled diesel fumes in locomotive cabs and claimed that the fumes "gagged him," made breathing difficult and caused headaches. He claims to have been ill by diesel exhaust when he stopped in tunnels while on an engine.
He claims that he inquired with his doctors about the link between his railway work and kidney cancer, but they did not offer any information about this connection. He argues that this was negligent and that the railroad defendant ought to have known about the connection between exposure to these chemicals and kidney cancer. He wants to be compensated for his medical costs in addition to pain and suffering and the loss of earnings.
Damages
The damages in a kidney cancer lawsuit filed by a railroad result from a combination of medical expenses, lost wages and other expenses. The amount of damages will vary widely depending on the specific case. A competent lawyer will ensure that you receive full compensation for your losses.
In Bladder cancer lawsuit , a man aged 51 was diagnosed with myelodysplastic disorder (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2008. Bladder cancer lawsuit was employed as maintenance of way employees for Chicago & North Western Railway and its successor Union Pacific Railroad from 1976 to 2008 as a machinist. He was exposed to chemicals containing benzene, including creosote, and degreasing agents.
Railroad companies are legally accountable for ensuring that they adhere to safety regulations. This includes protecting workers from carcinogens. If a railroad company fails in this obligation and causes harm to those affected and their families can be devastating.
Hughes Law Offices has represented thousands of injured individuals and railroad workers exposed to toxic fumes. Call us now for a free consultation with an experienced lawyer for railroad injuries. The founder Andrew Hughes actually defended railroads in FELA cases for most of his legal career, which means his knowledge of the laws governing these claims and the conditions that can arise from on-the-job exposure.